People

A bona fide occupational qualification permits an employer to consider a protected characteristic—such as gender or religion—when that trait is reasonably essential to the core function of the job. Option A claims BFOQs are illegal, which is incorrect; they are a narrow exception to Title VII, not a blanket prohibition, so confusing the exception with a violation.

The four‑fifths rule, also called the 80 % test, evaluates whether a selection rate for a protected group is less than 80 % of the rate for the majority group, indicating adverse impact. Option A links the rule to pay equity, but the metric assesses hiring or promotion practices, not compensation differences, so it misapplies the statistical test.

A bona fide occupational qualification permits an employer to consider a protected characteristic—such as gender or religion—when that trait is reasonably essential to the core function of the job. A diagram for this topic isn't available yet — the worked example below walks the same reasoning step by step.

• !Option A claims BFOQs are illegal, which is incorrect; they are a narrow exception to Title VII, not a blanket prohibition, so confusing the exception with a violation.
• !Making a PIP indefinite or keeping it verbal only deprives the employee of a clear path to success and fails to establish a proper documentation trail.

Answer each from memory — you'll see instantly whether you're right and why.

Run a focused 10-question mini-mock on People and see it stick.