Constitutional law
⏱ ~3-min readAceMark GuideWhat this topic is really about
The Supreme Court of India established the doctrine of basic structure in the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case in 1973 to limit Parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Golak Nath is incorrect because it held that fundamental rights could not be amended at all, a position later modified by Kesavananda Bharati.
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution explicitly guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty, stating that no person shall be deprived of these except according to procedure established by law. Option A is incorrect because the right to equality is protected under Articles 14 to 18, not Article 21.
See the mechanism
Part III of the Indian Constitution contains Articles 12 to 35, which guarantee fundamental rights to citizens. A diagram for this topic isn't available yet — the worked example below walks the same reasoning step by step.
An exam-style question, fully explained
Fundamental rights in the Indian Constitution are enshrined in:
- Identify what the question tests: Fundamental rights in the Indian Constitution are enshrined in:.
- Part III of the Indian Constitution contains Articles 12 to 35, which guarantee fundamental rights to citizens.
- In contrast, Part II deals with citizenship and Part IV outlines the Directive Principles of State Policy, making Option B the only correct choice.
Traps the examiner sets
- Option A is incorrect because the right to equality is protected under Articles 14 to 18, not Article 21.
- Golak Nath is incorrect because it held that fundamental rights could not be amended at all, a position later modified by Kesavananda Bharati.
Test your recall
Answer each from memory — you'll see instantly whether you're right and why.
Run a focused 10-question mini-mock on Constitutional law and see it stick.
Practice more of this topic →